Predicting the Future: Scenario Planning vs. Traditional Forecasting
Whether
we like it or not, change is inevitable. Change can be good; change can be bad.
From a technological perspective, new emerging technologies have the potential
to reshape our future. The Industrial Revolution, for example, brought about
large-scale industrial technologies that had a substantial impact on the people
of the time. Unfortunately, there were also negative impacts such as pollution
and poor labor conditions. How can we approach change? We can approach change by
being prepared. One of the best ways to prepare (for literally anything) is
proper planning. As it is related to futuring and innovation, there are two
predominant concepts that can assist with planning and predicting change: scenario
planning and traditional forecasting.
Scenario
planning is a good tool for researchers to have in their figurative toolbox. This
type of planning can assist with identifying potential outcomes. These outcomes
can then be weighed and prioritized to help predict future outcomes. Scenario
planning is used in a wide variety of industries. One such use of scenario
planning is in business. Businesses will use scenario planning to identify
potential outcomes, estimated impacts, and evaluate responses to both positive
and negative possibilities (Luther, 2022). Scenario planning helps take those “what
if” questions to examine second and third order effects so that the
organization can plan to accommodate for those changes.
Traditional
forecasting is another tool that can be used to predict future changes. Simply
put, traditional forecasting is concerned with predicting future outcomes. Unlike
scenario planning, traditional forecasting methods are not as creative (Mortlock,
n.d.). Mortlock (n.d.) also explains that traditional forecasting methods rely
heavily on the assumption that the future looks like the current state
(whatever that may be). The data used to provide traditional forecasting is
typically in the form of historical quantitative inputs and methodology.
The
advantages of scenario planning are that it is more creative and can provide
several plausible predictions. It can also be used to explore risk and
uncertainties when used for planning (Mortlock, n.d.). A few cons of scenario
planning include the subjectivity of the process. Being subjective, it can be
difficult to test for accuracy (Mortlock, n.d.).
The
advantage of traditional forecasting methods includes the fact that it can be
tested for accuracy. Forecasting predictions are based on objective truth. As
discussed, data involved is typically in the form of historical data. As such,
the results of forecasting can generally be replicated (Mortlock, n.d.). One of
the biggest pitfalls is the lack of creativity. This lack of creativity provides
a single, probable result without considering risk and uncertainty (Mortlock,
n.d.).
References
Luther, D. (2022, August
25). Scenario planning: Strategy, steps and practical examples. https://www.netsuite.com/portal/resource/articles/financial-management/scenario-planning.shtml#:~:text=In%20the%20context%20of%20a,how%20your%20organization%20will%20respond.
Mortlock, L. (n.d.). Scenario
planning vs. forecasting: 6 questions to ask to prepare for a post-pandemic
future. https://www.leadershipnow.com/leadingblog/2021/05/scenario_planning_vs_forecasti.html
Comments
Post a Comment